Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 FSUPP 109 - In Re Daigle

In Re Daigle’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
April 2007
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2007

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

50195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 104

Relies on Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp. · United States v. Callahan Walker Construction Co. · United States v. Fogarty · United States v. Curtis · 63 F. Supp. 400 - In Re C & P Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'employer' then means the person having control of the payment of such wages”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.