Conlin v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

cited by 6 later decisions

March 2019

most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382C (§ 1614 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Berry v. Schweiker · Perez v. Chater · Mongeur v. Heckler · Johnson v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“The amount of weight to give such opinions is based in part on the examining and treatment relationship, length and frequency of the examinations, the extent of relevant evidence given to support the opinion, and consistency with the record as a whole.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Allen v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. · Martino v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
“(Dkt. # 8 at 327). I do not find that the ALJ's assessment of Ms. McKnight's opinions was erroneous. First, licensed clinical social workers are not considered acceptable”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Cowley v. Berryhill
“the ALJ is not obligated in a social security disability benefits case to explicitly reconcile every conflicting shred of medical testimony[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Hastrich v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.