111 Ga. 848
Decided June 8, 1900
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1900-06-08
<p>Complaint. Before Judge Smith. Wilcox superior court. September term, 1899.</p>
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“There can be no equation of errors in the trial of a case. [Cit.]”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Holmes v. Henderson
Relies on Woolfolk v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1900-06-08
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2001
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶11. An absolute and unconditional promissory note can not be so changed by evidence of a contemporaneous parol agreement as to engraft upon it a condition. Civil Code, §3675.
¶22. If, in the trial of a case; one party introduce immaterial and illegal evidence without objection, the other party is not thereby entitled to introduce, over objection, other illegal evidence in rebuttal. There can be no equation of errors in the trial of a case. Woolfolk v. State, 81 Ga. 552.
¶3Judgment reversed.