State v. Ribbel’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2020
1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Arceo · In Re Peterson v. Hawaii Electric Light Co. · State v. Levi · State v. Smith · State v. Stoa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) The application for writ of certiorari shall tersely state its grounds, which shall include: (1) Grave errors of law or of fact; or (2) Obvious inconsistencies in the decision of the intermediate appellate court with that of the supreme court, federal decisions, or its own decision, and the magnitude of those errors or inconsistencies dictating the need for further appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Mandatory use of seat belts, when, penalty”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Giugliano
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.