111 Ill. App. 3d 169 - Hunter v. Sukkar’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
33 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 33 Ill. 2d 326 - Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital · 85 Ill. 2d 1 - Alvis v. Ribar · 8 Ill. 2d 293 - Belfield v. Coop · 50 Ill. App. 2d 253 - Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital · 9 Ill. App. 2d 263 - Eizerman v. Behn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We, the jury, find for the plaintiff and against the defendant and further find the following: First. Without taking into consideration the question of damages due to the negligence of the plaintiff, if any, we find that the total amount of damages suffered by the plaintiff as a proximate result of the occurrence in question is $__ Second: Assuming that 100 percent represents the total combined negligence of the plaintiff and of the defendant, we find that the percentage of negligence that was a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury attributable solely to the plaintiff is _percent (%).” Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions, Civil, No. A45.06 (2d ed. Supp. 1986).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.