Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

111 Ind. 402

Hicks v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1887

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1887-06-29

<p>Ckimihai, Law.—Arraignment and Plea.—Reversal of Judgment.—Where, in a criminal case, the record does not show that the defendant was arraigned or waived arraignment, or that a plea was entered by or for him, a judgment of conviction will be reversed.</p>

Relies on Bowen v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1887-06-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 1933

16 state decisions

50188718901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Zollars, C. J.

¶1The record not showing that appellant was arraigned or waived it, nor that a plea was entered either by or for him, there is no alternative but to -reverse the judgment. Bowen v. State, 108 Ind. 411, and cases there cited.

¶2The judgment is reversed, and the clerk is directed to make the proper order for the return of appellant to the custody of the sheriff of Switzerland county to await further proceedings.

/111/ind/402 · .json · Public domain