Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 LA 326 - Covington v. Roberson

Covington v. Roberson’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2017

20 state decisions

50190319101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Callahan v. Ingram · Sandoz v. Veazie · Staub v. Van Benthuysen · 39 La. Ann. 377 - Burns v. Thompson · Williams v. McManus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In cases of slander the findings of the jury will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous, improper, and not sustained by any correct view of the evidence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.