State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1904
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 1996
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Marler · 51 La. Ann. 434 - State v. Favre · State v. Horne · Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Vance · Bell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The trial judge may permit á witness to be recalled in order to be re-examined by the party recalling him. As a matter of discretion, this is not reviewable by the appellate court unless resulting prejudice should clearly appear. It is not unusual for the trial court to allow a witness to be recalled to lay a foundation for his impeachment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rogers““The mere fact that the party making’ the declaration lived for some time after having made it does not withdraw from it its original character as a dying declaration.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robertson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.