Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 Md. App. 511 - Lemon v. Stewart

111 Md. App. 511 - Lemon v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 17 Cal. 3d 425 - Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California · Faya v. Almaraz · Henley v. Prince George's County · Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros. · Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The common law duty of care owed by a health care provider to diagnose, evaluate, and treat its patient ordinarily flows only to the patient, not to third parties. Thus, it has often been said that a malpractice action lies only where a health care provider-patient relationship exists and there has been a breach of a professional duty owing to the patient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “absent a statute permitting otherwise, the patient has a right to assume that his medical condition will not voluntarily be disclosed by the provider to other persons without the patient's consent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. (2007)
  3. “[T]he relationship between a health care provider and [a] patient is one of trust and confidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. (2007)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.