Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 MICH 213 - Slack v. Norton

Slack v. Norton’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
June 1933
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1933

9 state decisions

5018961900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on West v. Laraway · Tillman v. Shackleton · Mason v. Dunbar · Stackable v. Estate of Stackable

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the present case, the wife was permitted by her husband to keep boarders, furnished the provisions herself, and with which it is apparent the husband had nothing to do.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.