Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 Mich. App. 818 - People v. Williams

111 Mich. App. 818 - People v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1994
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he purpose of Phase 2 is to determine whether the interests of the child and the public would best be served by retaining or waiving jurisdiction. Therefore, this hearing can be characterized as dispositional ... The significance of this is that information which would not be admissible as evidence in an adjudication may be brought before the court to enable it to conduct a `full investigation' on disposition of a child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “apply to all actions and proceedings in the courts of this state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.