Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 N.C. App. 206 - Lassiter v. Faison

111 N.C. App. 206 - Lassiter v. Faison’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. Satterfield Development Co. · Prentzas v. Prentzas · 16 N.C. App. 147 - Ingram v. Smith · Patrick v. Hurdle · Hodge v. Perry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “action may be commenced against [the] personal representative or collector after the expiration”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Every personal representative and collector after the granting of letters shall notify all persons, firms and corporations having claims against the decedent to present the same to such personal representative or collector, on or before a day to be named in such notice, which day must be at least three months from the day of the first publication or posting of such notice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Death before limitation expires; action by or against personal representative or collector[,]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.