Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 N.C. App. 321 - Minter v. Minter

111 N.C. App. 321 - Minter v. Minter’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2015

18 state decisions

100199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 72 N.C. App. 372 - Wade v. Wade · Wade v. Wade · Hagler v. Hagler · Armstrong v. Armstrong · 68 N.C. App. 548 - Alexander v. Alexander

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Separate property” means all real and personal property acquired by a spouse before marriage or acquired by a spouse by bequest, devise, descent, or gift during the course of the marriage. However, property acquired by gift from the other spouse during the course of the marriage shall be considered separate property only if such an intention is stated in the conveyance. Property acquired in exchange for separate property shall remain separate property regardless of whether the title is in the name of the husband or wife[,] or both[,] and shall not be considered to be marital property unless a contrary intention is expressly stated in the conveyance. The increase in value of separate property and the income derived from separate property shall be considered separate property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[o]nce this showing [that the assets were acquired during the marriage] had been made, the burden of proof necessary to show that the assets were marital had been met. The burden then shifted to the defendant to show that the source of the contested property was separate property[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “that the property: (1) was acquired by either spouse or both spouses; and (2) was acquired during the course of the marriage; and (3) was acquired before the date of the separation of the parties; and (4) is presently owned.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.