Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 N.C. App. 40 - State v. Minter

111 N.C. App. 40 - State v. Minter’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2012

22 state decisions

100199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Basurto · State v. Moore · State v. Cutshall · United States v. Webster · State v. Hunt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he prior inconsistent statement of a witness ... is not admissible as substantive evidence unless it properly falls within an exception to the hearsay rule or except as provided by statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.