Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 Nev. 1121 - Arterburn v. State

Arterburn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2025

17 state decisions

801995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Florida v. Royer · Brown v. Illinois · Dunaway v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n order to determine whether a confession obtained during a Fourth Amendment violation is admissible, the following factors, in addition to voluntariness, must be assessed: (1) "the temporal proximity of the arrest and the confession," (2) "the presence of intervening circumstances," and (3) "the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct." The government has the burden of showing a "sufficient break in events to undermine the inference that the confession was caused by the Fourth Amendment violation." Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 306 [ 105 S.Ct. 1285, 1291 , 84 L.Ed.2d 222 ] (1984).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]henever a police officer accosts an individual and restrains his freedom to walk away, he has 'seized' that person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the temporal proximity of the arrest and the confession,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.