Desimone v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
states following
March 2000
most recently cited
2 district · 13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Halper · United States v. Dixon · Marchetti v. United States · Austin v. United States · Breed v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he sponsor of the bill giving rise to NRS chapter 372A introduced the legislation as serving two purposes: first, to “get the drug dealers where it really hurts—in the pocketbook,” and second, to provide “a whole new avenue of deterrents and punishment for drug dealers outside of the fines, sentences and courtroom procedures under current law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Desimone v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.