Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 Nev. 1363 - Benitez v. State

Benitez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hill v. Lockhart · Carnegie v. United States · McGuire v. United States · Warden, Nevada State Prison v. Lyons · Talancon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A superseding indictment brought after the statute of limitations has expired is valid so long as the original indictment is still pending and was timely and the superseding indictment does not broaden or substantially amend the original charges.... Notice to the defendant is the central policy underlying the statutes of limitation. If the allegations and charges are substantially the same in the old and new indictments, the assumption is that the defendant has been placed on notice of the charges against him. That is, he knows that he will be called to account for certain activities and should prepare a defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.