Barrett v. Baird’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Lioce v. Cohen (2008), Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Thitchener (2008)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Vance v. Bradley · Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co. · In Re Peterson · 472 So. 2d 1145 - Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he right of malpractice plaintiffs to sue for damages caused by medical professionals does not involve a fundamental constitutional right.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Since the parties are in no way precluded from impeaching the panel’s conclusion by competent evidence, or from showing that relevant evidence was not presented to the panel or from demonstrating the limited nature of the panel proceeding, we conclude that there is no valid concern that jurors will “overvalue” the panel findings. For purposes of the constitutional right to jury trial, the jury is and remains the final arbiter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Irish v. Gimbel“"[t]o warrant reversal on grounds of attorney misconduct, the `flavor of misconduct must sufficiently permeate an entire proceeding to provide conviction that the jury was influenced by passion and prejudice in reaching its verdict.'" Kehr v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc., 736 F.2d 1283, 1286 (9th Cir.1984) (quoting Standard Oil of California v. Perkins, 347 F.2d 379, 388 (9th Cir.1965)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. DeJesus v. Flick
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.