Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 N.J. Super. 299 - State v. Ferrante

111 N.J. Super. 299 - State v. Ferrante’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably State v. Gregory (1975), State v. Best (1976)

43 state decisions

19019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Costello v. United States · Manfredi v. United States · State v. Weleck · State v. Currie · United States v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... [I]t is well established that the State may not carve up a single conspiracy into smaller conspiracies for the purpose of multiple prosecutions... If, in fact, the alleged conspiracy is but one overall collusive arrangement, it must be treated as such by the prosecution. [at 303]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]bsent misconduct or abdication by grand jurors, the question whether evidence before a grand jury was competent or incompetent, we find to be irrelevant on a motion to dismiss the indictment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “where evidence is clearly lacking it is the duty of the court to set aside the charges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.