Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 N.M. 137 - Landavazo v. Sanchez

Landavazo v. Sanchez’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

94 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Ponder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (2000), Weidler v. Big J Enterprises, Inc. (1997)

94 state decisions

520199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors Company · Security Escrow Corp. v. State of Taxation & Revenue Department · State v. Hoxsie · Lumpkins v. McPhee · Kaiser Steel Corporation v. WS Ranch Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence that a reasonable mind would find adequate to support a conclusion.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A. The court shall award the condemnee his litigation expenses whenever: (3) there is a final determination that the condemnor does not have a right to take the property sought to be acquired in the condemnation proceeding.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “When determining whether a finding of fact is supported by substantial evidence, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the finding and indulge all reasonable inferences in support of the trial court's decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.