Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 N.M. 590 - State v. Gonzales

State v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 68 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2022 · most notably JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TB (1994), Santillanes v. State (1993)

2 federal appellate · 68 state decisions — followed in 10 states

4601991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · Taylor v. Louisiana · Lockhart v. McCree · 22 Cal. 3d 258 - People v. Wheeler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) he is a member of a cognizable racial group; (2) the state has exercised its peremptory challenges to remove members of that group from the jury panel; (3) these facts and any other relevant circumstances raise an inference that the state used its challenges to exclude members of the panel solely on account of their race.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “there are sound reasons for allowing a party to brief issues on a nonsummary calendar that may have been deemed abandoned during the time an appeal was being considered under [the] summary calendar.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.