Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 N.M. 722 - Jaramillo v. State

Jaramillo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

1 district · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Cummings v. X-Ray Associates of New Mexico, P. C. (1996), Coleman v. United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. (1994)

1 district · 34 state decisions

200199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Sullivan v. United States · Jim McNeff, Inc. v. Todd · Howell Ex Rel. Howell v. Burk · Richardson Ex Rel. Estate of Richardson v. Carnegie Library Restaurant, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the legislature could reasonably be concerned that there are more claims against governmental than private entities, given the size and far-flung nature of state government operations. This directly increases both the burden of investigating potential claims and the danger of stale claims. Second, the lack of a tolling provision advances the state’s interest in predicting and controlling its potential liabilities from year to year. Both of these are legitimate, rational distinctions that are directly related to the failure to provide a tolling period for persons who are mentally incapacitated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Legally, [ Trujillo ] involve[s] not simply the right of access to the courts, but a constitutionally protected right of full recovery in tort that is one aspect of the general right of access to the courts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “rights to due process of law because it requires filing the claim within an unreasonable period of time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.