Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 Ohio App. 76 - State, Ex Rel. Ebersole v. Hurst

111 Ohio App. 76 - State, Ex Rel. Ebersole v. Hurst’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2018

13 state decisions

80196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is not for the courts to change the statutes to conform to what the courts consider a better rule. This would be judicial legislation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.