111 Ohio App. 3d 565 - State v. Shade’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Heinish · State v. Scudder · State v. Parker · Tri Creek Lumber Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause the defense was not surprised or prejudiced in any way by the state's failure to disclose a `chain of custody' witness, * * * the trial court abused its discretion in imposing the harshest of sanctions[, i.e., excluding the evidence]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.