Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 OHIOST3D 14 - State v. Drummond

State v. Drummond’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

354
cited by 354 later decisions
6
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 348 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 354 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Hunter (2011), State v. Diar (2008)

4 federal appellate · 348 state decisions

1940200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 354 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the record contains no evidence which would justify the filing of a motion to suppress, the appellant has not met his burden of proving that his attorney violated an essential duty by failing to file the motion.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hen a trial judge orders a partial, as opposed to a total, closure of a court proceeding, a 'substantial reason' rather than Waller's 'overriding interest' will justify the closure.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.