State v. Stahl’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
167 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 168 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably 153 Ohio St. 3d 422 - State v. Clinton (2017), State v. Jones (2012)
167 state decisions — followed in 13 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Davis v. Washington · White v. Illinois · Horton v. Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 168 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For Confrontation Clause purposes, a testimonial statement includes one made `under circumstances which would lead an objective witness reasonably to believe that the statement would be available for use at a later trial.'”
24 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“under circumstances which would lead an objective witness reasonably to believe that the statement would be available for use at a later trial.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“'when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no * * * ongoing emergency, and that the primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.