State v. Elmore’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
297 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 299 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably State v. Hunter (2011), State v. Maxwell (2014)
297 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · State v. Thompkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 299 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Probable cause for a warrantless arrest requires that the arresting officer, at the time of the arrest, possess sufficient information that would cause a reasonable and prudent person to believe that a criminal offense has been or is being committed. Gerstein v. Pugh (1975), 420 U.S. 103 , 111-112 , 95 S.Ct. 854 , 43 L.Ed.2d 54 ; Beck v. Ohio (1964), 379 U.S. 89 , 91 , 85 S.Ct. 223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 . In determining whether probable cause existed, we examine the *Page 10 `totality' of facts and circumstances surrounding the arrest. See State v. Homan (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 421 , 427 , 2000-Ohio-212 , 732 N.E.2d 952 .”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“'Debatable trial tactics generally do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Armor · State v. Zhu“In making that determination, trial courts must apply an objective standard: `For provocation to be reasonably sufficient, it must be sufficient to arouse the passions of an ordinary person beyond the power of his or her control.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.