Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 Okla. 293 - Sankey v. Suggs

Sankey v. Suggs’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
October 1983
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 1983

9 state decisions

401925193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co. v. King · Ellet-Kendall Shoe Co. v. Ross · Swartzburg v. Dickerson · Cochran Grocery Co. v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An actual and continued change of possession as contemplated by the statute must be open, notorious, and unequivocal, and such a change as to apprise the community, or those who are accustomed to deal with the party, that the goods have changed hands, and the title has passed from the vendor to the vendee.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.