Conner v. Bartlett’s Empirical Analysis
1925
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1931
most recently cited
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lomax v. Pickering · McDuffie v. Geiser Mfg. Co. · Woodworth, County Clerk v. Town of Hennessey · Hollister v. Abbott · Comanche Ice Fuel Co. v. Binder Hillery
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When a matter lias onefe passed to final judgment without fraud or collusion, in a court of competent jurisdiction it has become res judicata, and,the same matter, between the same parties, cannot be reopened or subsequently considered in another action.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Shimonek v. Tillman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.