Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 Okla. 66 - Boling v. Ashbridge

Boling v. Ashbridge’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
November 1981
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 1981

15 state decisions

501925193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on St Louis Dressed Beef Provision Company v. Maryland Casualty Company · Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co. · Brassil v. . Maryland Casualty Co. · Connolly v. Bolster · Sanders v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No action shall lie against the company to recover any loss under or by reason of this policy unless it shall be brought in the name of the assured for loss actually sustained and paid in money, by the assured in satisfaction of a judgment after actual trial of the issue, nor unless such action is brought within two years after such judgment against the assured has been so paid and satisfied.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.