Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 Or. App. 147 - State v. Wilson

111 Or. App. 147 - State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
January 2000
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[W]e review whether the reasons given by the court are appropriate. That review is limited to whether the reasons are substantial and compelling. That is, we review the explanation of why the circumstances are so exceptional that imposition of the presumptive sentence would not accomplish the purposes of the guidelines. If the explanation does not demonstrate that, we must remand for resentencing. ORS 138.222(5). If it does, we will not disturb the trial court's exercise of discretion." (Emphasis in original.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) Are supported by the evidence in the record; and”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.