Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

111 Or. App. 406

State v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 12, 1992

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1992-02-12

Decided 1992-02-12

PER CURIAM

¶1Defendant appeals his conviction for delivery of, conspiracy to deliver and possession of methamphetamine and three counts of endangering the welfare of a minor. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal. The evidence was sufficient to support the convictions.

¶2Defendant also assigns error to the trial court’s imposition of sentence. The state concedes that the trial court erred in sentencing defendant under the “scheme or network” provision of OAR 253-04-004. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev dismissed 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991); State v. Medina, 111 Or App 108, 823 P2d 453 (1992).

¶3Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

/111/orapp/406 · .json · Public domain