People v. Madden’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably People v. Pahl (2006), People v. Weinreich (2005)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stirone v. United States · Russell v. United States · Schmuck v. United States · United States v. Miller · Hartman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the plain and ordinary meaning of the statutory language.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In assessing the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a guilty verdict, a reviewing court must determine whether any rational trier of fact might accept the evidence, taken as a whole and in the light most favorable to the prosecution, as sufficient to support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Houser“The United States and Colorado Constitutions guarantee a defendant the fundamental right to be notified of the charges made against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Riley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.