111 So. 2d 459 - Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2002
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Greathouse v. United States · State v. Melson · 76 So. 2d 645 - Green v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our forgery statute, F.S. § 831.01, F.S.A., makes whoever `forges' documents of specified classes `with intent to injure or defraud any person' liable to a maximum of [five] years' imprisonment. This statute does not repeal the common law, but merely enlarges the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Escobedo“`the making of a writing which falsely purports to be the writing of another.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Escobedo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.