Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 So. 3d 257 - Ware v. State

111 So. 3d 257 - Ware v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Giglio v. United States · 166 So. 2d 892 - State v. Weeks · Petition of Graham ex rel. Nine Condemned Men v. State · 71 So. 3d 86 - Wyatt v. State · Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under Graham v. State, 372 So.2d 1363 (Fla.1979), in deciding whether to appoint counsel for an indigent defendant filing a postconviction motion, the trial court should consider: (1) the adversary nature of the proceeding; (2) its complexity; (3) the need for an eviden-tiary hearing; and (4) the need for substantial legal research.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.