Cameron v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · 538 So. 2d 1001 - Thibodeaux v. Burton · Sessions & Fishman v. Liquid Air Corp. · 9 So. 3d 815 - Arias v. Stolthaven New Orleans, L.L.C. · In re the Succession of Brantley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in order for liability to attach under a duty/risk analysis, a plaintiff must prove five separate elements: (1) the defendant had a duty to conform his or her conduct to a specific standard of care (the duty element); (2) the defendant failed to conform his or her conduct to the appropriate standard (the breach of duty element); (3) the defendant's substandard conduct was a cause-in-fact of the plaintiff's injuries (the cause-in-fact element); (4) the defendant's substandard conduct was a legal cause of the plaintiff's injuries (the scope of liability or scope of protection element); and, (5) actual damages (the damages element).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[h]earsay evidence does not sustain the burden of proving the prima facie case necessary for confirmation of default.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.