Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 SO3D 494 - State v. Goosby

State v. Goosby’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · Arizona v. Youngblood · State v. Dorthey · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Spoliation creates a presumption that the evidence was destroyed because it would have been detrimental to one’s case. The presumption of spoliation is not applicable when failure to produce the evidence is adequately explained. It is generally utilized in civil litigation. In criminal cases, a defendant is not deprived of his due process rights based on the state’s failure to preserve potentially exculpatory evidentiary material unless bad faith is demonstrated. To receive the adverse inference, both destruction of evidence and bad faith is required. [Internal citation omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.