Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 SW3D 249 - Wilder v. State

Wilder v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 336th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on California v. Green · Harris v. New York · Idaho v. Wright · Walder v. United States · White v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the case of this witness, we hold the trial court did not err in admitting this evidence under Rule 803(4) because it would be a reasonable inference that C.G., who was a high school student, would have understood she was seeing Petite for the purpose of medical treatment in connection with the abuse, and that C.G.'s statements to Petite were made for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In view of the foregoing facts, we find that it is reasonable to infer that T.N.W. understood that she was receiving therapy for purposes of medical treatment in connection with the abuse and that her statements to Pruitt were made for purposes of medical diagnosis and treatment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.