¶1 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
¶2 Appellant bases his motion for rehearing on the renewed contention that the officers searched the car without probable cause and hence their evidence as to finding whiskey in it was improperly received. We have again reviewed the facts and think appellant’s position not tenable. Rochelle v. State, 107 Tex. Cr. R. 79, 294 S. W. 860; Washington v. State, 107 Tex. Cr. R. 214, 296 S. W. 512; Smyrle v. State, 107 Tex. Cr. R. 663, 298 S. W. 598.
¶3 The motion for rehearing is overruled.
¶4 Overruled.