Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Sargent

111 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Sargent’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
4
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently September 2019 · most notably State v. Copeland (1996), 64 Wash. App. 410 - State v. Walton (1992)

70 state decisions

3601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Wade · Gault · Rhode Island v. Innis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he term `interrogation' under Miranda refers not only to express questioning, but also to any words or actions on the part of the police . . . that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]his is not the functional equivalent of interrogation—it is interrogation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In the context of deciding that a defendant’s request to see his probation officer during questioning is not an invocation of the right to counsel, the United States Supreme Court stressed the fact that the probation officer’s allegiance is unquestionably due the State, not the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.