111 Wash. 2d 845 - State v. Lidge’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably 125 Wash. 2d 876 - State v. Warner (1995), 68 Wash. App. 134 - State v. Potter (1992)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rochin v. People of California · United States v. Lovasco · 100 Wash. 2d 706 - State v. Judge · 102 Wash. 2d 348 - State v. Calderon · 109 Wash. 2d 602 - State v. Alvin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The defendant must show he was prejudiced by the delay; (2) the court must consider the reasons for the delay; and (3) if the State is able to justify the delay, the court must undertake a further balancing of the State's interest and the prejudice to the accused.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'completely satisfied that [they] should prosecute and will be able promptly to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he determination of when the evidence available to the prosecution is sufficient to obtain a conviction is seldom clear-cut, and reasonable persons often will reach conflicting conclusions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.