111 Wash. 2d 859 - State v. Duncan’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 2001
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act)
Relies on Benton v. Maryland · Green v. United States · Abbate v. United States · Heath v. Alabama · 82 Wash. 2d 577 - State v. Roybal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever, upon the trial of any person for a crime, it appears that the offense was committed in another state or country, under such circumstances that the courts of this state had jurisdiction thereof, and that the defendant has already been acquitted or convicted upon the merits, upon a criminal prosecution under the laws of such state or country, founded upon the act or omission with respect to which he is upon trial, such former acquittal or conviction is a sufficient defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“protection against double jeopardy in multiple jurisdictions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ivie“Any other reason justifying relief . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.