111 Wash. App. 738 - State v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · 94 Wash. 2d 634 - State v. Delmarter · 122 Wash. 2d 109 - State v. Halstien · 88 Wash. 2d 899 - State v. Partin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A requirement that an offense be committed wilfully is satisfied if a person acts knowingly with respect to the material elements of the offense, unless a purpose to impose further requirements plainly appears.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ware“A person is guilty of obstructing a law enforcement officer if the person willfully hinders, delays, or obstructs any law enforcement officer in the discharge of his or her official powers or duties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ware“FF 6. Ms. Ware challenges the finding because it neglects to state that her actions were willful. That argument must necessarily fail because the relevant statutes generally equate”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ware
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.