Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 Wis. 127 - Hempton v. State

Hempton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
16
states following
February 1985
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently February 1985 · most notably United States v. Brawner (1972), People v. Troche (1928)

4 federal appellate · 56 state decisions — followed in 16 states

120190119101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mattox v. United States · Hopt v. People · Andersen v. State · The People v. . Rogers · Fertig v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . to scrutinize the evidence with the greatest care, view it in the most favorable light it will reasonably admit of from the standpoint of the accused, and, whether requested or not, to submit to the jury every phase of criminal homicide to which it can be said reasonably to apply. We assume that the learned trial judge endeavored to do that and decided that there was nothing but mere conjecture upon which to base a verdict of manslaughter in either the first or fourth degree.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[D]runkenness, together with other causes affecting the mind, is proper for the consideration of the jury . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The important circumstance is the disordered intellect, not the means by which it was produced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.