111 Wis. 2d 691 - State v. Ott’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2019
3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 60 Wis. 2d 404 - State v. Weso · 108 Wis. 2d 734 - After Hour Welding, Inc. v. Laneil Management Co. · 83 Wis. 2d 440 - Balistreri v. State · 105 Wis. 2d 130 - After Hour Welding, Inc. v. Laneil Management Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“given the nature of the extraneous material [a dictionary definition] brought to the jury's deliberations, the probable effect upon a hypothetical average jury would be prejudicial”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“was sufficiently broader than the technical meaning embodied in the instruction to probably prejudice Ott.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“except that a juror may testify on the question whether extraneous prejudicial information was improperly brought to the jury's attention or whether any outside influence was improperly brought to bear upon any juror”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.