¶1Application unanimously denied and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Mandamus, like prohibition, is an extraordinary remedy and it is not appropriate in *54this case (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12,16; see also, Matter of Okereke v Kane, 98 AD2d 990). (Article 78.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
112 A.D.2d 53
Knowle v. Kane
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 4, 1985
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1985-06-04
Decided 1985-06-04