Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 ALA 532 - Lillich v. Moore

Lillich v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 1935
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1935

8 state decisions

4018951900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kimbrell v. Rogers · Rudulph v. Brewer · Beachman v. Aurora Silver Plate Manufacturing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We know of no exception to the rule that, when errors injurious to some of the appellants only are assigned by them all jointly, they are not available to work a reversal, and will not be considered by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.