State v. Rodriguez’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently February 1995 · most notably State v. Rios (1976), In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-86715 (1979)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Darling · People v. Jaworski · 23 Ariz. App. 251 - State v. Mendiola · 22 Ariz. App. 478 - State v. Rodriguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Before accepting a plea of guilty or no contest, the court shall address the defendant personally in open court, informing him of and determining that he understands the following: ****** “b. The nature and range of possible sentence for the offense to which the plea is offered, including any special conditions regarding sentence, parole, or commutation imposed by statute; * * * ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Munoz · State v. Gil““[Mjuch judicial time could be saved if the judge, the defense attorney, and the attorney for the State would make an effort to comply with the requirements of Rule 17.3, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure.” State v. Rodrigues, supra.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Morones““No cause shall be reversed for technical error in pleadings or proceedings when upon the whole cause it shall appear that substantial justice has been done.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Morones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.