Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 Ariz. 282 - Stanley v. Stanley

Stanley v. Stanley’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
6
states following
October 1991
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 1991 · most notably State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Pickrell (1983), Allen v. Fisher (1977)

31 state decisions

200197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Morrissey · Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. Glover · Ruhsam v. Ruhsam · Ruhsam v. Ruhsam · Morrissey v. Perry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The reduction in the age of majority was a comprehensive piece of legislation which amended no fewer than ninety sections of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Chapter 146, Laws of 1972. In two instances the legislature expressly preserved the minority status for some members of the class until age 21, but these are unrelated to child support.” See Chapter 146 §§ 88, 89, Laws of 1972.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Our opinion in Ruhsam v. Ruhsam, 110 Ariz. 326 , 518 P.2d 576 , modified, 110 Ariz. 426 , 520 P.2d 298 (1974), has no application here. The rights and duties in that case arose by reason of an agreement of the parties, while in this case they arose by virtue of the child-support law of Arizona.” (Emphasis added). 112 Ariz. at 283 , 541 P.2d at 383 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.