State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably United States v. Moreno (2006), State v. Bollig (2000)
52 state decisions — followed in 14 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · State v. Contreras · State v. Davis · 17 Ariz. App. 553 - State v. Rodriguez · State v. Howell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a. The nature of the charge to which the plea is offered; b. The nature and range of possible sentence for the offense to which the plea is offered, including any special conditions regarding sentence, parole, or commutation imposed by statute; c. The constitutional rights which the defendant forgoes by pleading guilty or no contest, including his or her right to counsel if he or she is not represented by counsel; • d. The right to plead not guilty; e. That by pleading guilty or no contest in a noncapital case the defendant will waive the right to have the appellate courts review the proceedings by way of direct appeal, and may seek review only by filing a petition for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 32 and, if denied, a petition for review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hershberger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.